Industrial PC Project Kickoff Checklist
This checklist helps engineering teams align responsibilities and technical assumptions before starting an industrial project.
Table of Contents
Hardware & Architecture
- Modular vs. Single-board architecture defined
- CPU thermal envelope and performance margin evaluated
- Required expansion slots (Mini-PCIe, M.2) identified
- Wide voltage input (e.g., 9-36V DC) & OVP/UVP confirmed
Industrial I/O & Isolation
- Galvanic isolation requirements (2.5kV to 4000V) mapped for RS232/485
- Native CAN Bus support (low/mid/high speed) & 60Ω rule verified
- Cable length, routing, and EMI risk assessed
Edge AI & Inference
- Compute power matched to model (e.g., 32 TOPS for RK3588J based systems)
- Inference load vs. active/passive cooling limits defined
- AI agent / Docker deployment environment evaluated
Environment & Compliance
- Operating temperature boundaries (-40°C to +85°C) verified
- Vibration/shock exposure and Conformal Coating necessity assessed
- EMC, Safety, and local certification requirements listed
Project Kickoff FAQ
Why is defining the thermal envelope the most critical step in an industrial PC kickoff?
In fanless industrial environments, thermal dissipation dictates the entire system architecture. If a project requires high-performance processing (such as Intel i9 or discrete RTX series configurations), the baseline thermal design must account for sustained high-TDP loads without thermal throttling. Defining this upfront prevents the need for costly chassis redesigns or the fallback to active cooling, which introduces mechanical failure points.
At what stage should we define galvanic isolation requirements for our I/O interfaces?
Isolation requirements must be mapped immediately during the kickoff phase. Industrial environments inherently suffer from ground loops and EMI from high-power equipment like VFDs. Specifying 2.5kV to 4000V galvanic isolation for vulnerable ports—such as RS232/485, RJ45, and CAN Bus—dictates the PCB layout. Adding this protection natively prevents the need for external, failure-prone isolator dongles later in deployment.
How does choosing a modular architecture impact the OEM customization timeline?
Selecting a modular mainboard architecture drastically accelerates the engineering timeline and mitigates risk. For example, platforms utilizing an exclusive modular baseboard design (like the AX-130BT and AX-134BT series) allow engineers to customize specific I/O combinations without modifying the core processing unit. This bypasses the lengthy EVT/DVT validation cycles required for full single-board computer (SBC) redesigns.
How do we accurately scope NPU requirements for Edge AI projects?
Scoping requires matching your AI model’s inference load to a specific TOPS (Tera Operations Per Second) metric while staying within the fanless thermal budget. For robust automation tasks, specifying an efficient edge platform—such as the RK3588J delivering a validated 32 TOPS—ensures sufficient compute headroom. Clarifying these metrics early prevents over-engineering the hardware or starving the AI agent of resources during peak loads.
Why must fieldbus specifics, like CAN Bus configurations, be clarified before the hardware lock?
Fieldbus integrity relies on precise physical layer configurations. If a project requires native CAN Bus communication across low, medium, and high speeds, the hardware must be engineered with specific jumper settings to enforce the 60Ω terminal resistance rule. Addressing these granular electrical protection rules during kickoff guarantees absolute signal stability and prevents field communication errors once the equipment is deployed.
Discuss Your OEM Lifecycle Requirements
Submit your project specifications to our engineering team for a technical review of BOM locking, PCN timelines, and validation procedures.
Your privacy is protected. Engineering review typically occurs within 48 business hours.